• Home
  • About Me
  • Amazon Wish List

MANSIZEDTARGET.COM

Paleoconservative Observations

Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Married with Children

20 Jan 2006 by Mr. Roach

Very interesting City Journal article that discusses something I noticed in college: almost all of my successful, overachieving peers came from stable, two-parent households, often with stay-at-home moms. The author asks, what kind of society will we have where one group of people lives in this fashion, and expects its children to do so as well, while another consists of serially polygamous single moms that raise their kids in unhealthy, unstable environs devoid of marriage, wealth, and the prospect of long-term success. In other words, if the phrase “where do you stay at” is in your vocabulary and your “baby’s daddy” makes an appearance in the form of a faded polaroid, it’s likely your kids will have a similar (and similarly screwed up) lives:

It’s common sense, backed up by plenty of research, that you’ll have a better chance of fully “developing” your children—that is, of fulfilling The Mission—if you have a husband around. Children of single mothers have lower grades and educational attainment than kids who grow up with married parents, even after controlling for race, family background, and IQ. Children of divorce are also less likely to graduate and attend college, and when they do go for a B.A., they tend to go to less elite schools. Cornell professor Jennifer Gerner was baffled some years ago when she noticed that only about 10 percent of her students came from divorced families. She and her colleague Dean Lillard examined the records of students at the nation’s top 50 schools and, much to their surprise, found a similar pattern. Children who did not grow up with their two biological parents, they concluded when they published their findings, were only half as likely to go to a selective college. As adults, they also earned less and had lower occupational status.

To repeat the question: Why do educated women marry before they have children? Because, like high-status women since status began, they are preparing their offspring to carry on their way of life. Marriage radically increases their chances of doing that.

This all points to a deeply worrying conclusion: the Marriage Gap—and the inequality to which it is tied—is self-perpetuating. A low-income single mother, unprepared to carry out The Mission, is more likely to raise children who will become low-income single parents, who will pass that legacy on to their children, and so on down the line. Married parents are more likely to be visiting their married children and their grandchildren in their comfortable suburban homes, and those married children will in turn be sending their offspring off to good colleges, superior jobs, and wedding parties. Instead of an opportunity-rich country for all, the Marriage Gap threatens us with a rigid caste society.

  • Share this:
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit

Posted in Politics, Current Events, and Culture | 2 Comments

2 Responses

  1. on 22 Jan 2006 at 11:42 am Melba Peachtoast

    Prchal thinks that our society is eugenic, not dysgenic. Wow. Cornucopianism is one thing, but this degree of stupidity is another.


  2. on 10 Jul 2006 at 11:44 am One Of Your Statistics?

    Hmmm, interesting. I raised two sons by myself with nothing. I received an MBA while doing so (I am still paying my school loans off). My sons have both graduated from Private Colleges with HONORS. They both have good jobs making more money than I do annually, can think for themselves, love and visit their grandparents (both sides), both compassionate young men, have a conscience and also have manners. Amazing isn’t it?



Comments are closed.

  • Recent Comments

    • B Lode on Blogging Highlights 2008-10
    • Tom Piatak on Bipartisan Treachery
    • Blogging Highlights 2008-10 « MANSIZEDTARGET.COM on SPLC Defames Marek Chodakiewicz
    • Blogging Highlights 2008-10 « MANSIZEDTARGET.COM on On Teachable Moments
    • Blogging Highlights 2008-10 « MANSIZEDTARGET.COM on A Healthcare Proposal
  • Blogroll

    • “Mr.” Andrew Sullivan
    • Ace
    • American Conservative
    • Art Renewal
    • Catholic Answers
    • Chicago Law
    • Chronicles
    • Crescat
    • Crunchy Con
    • Curmudgeon
    • Digital Hairshirt
    • Drudge
    • Eunomia
    • Gates of Vienna
    • Gene Expression
    • Glaivester
    • Jim Kalb’s Turnabout
    • Lawrence Auster
    • Lying Eyes
    • Mild Colonial Boy
    • NR Online
    • Occidental Dissent
    • Postmodern Conservative
    • Preparedness
    • Pros and Cons
    • Protestant Pontifications
    • Realclearpolitics
    • Rick Darby
    • Self Reliance
    • Steve Sailer
    • Taki
    • The Agitator
    • Thinking Housewife
    • Traditional Catholicism
    • Vanishing American
    • Vdare
    • Volokh
    • What’s Wrong With the World?
    • Wise Man’s Heart
    • WordPress.com
    • Zero Hedge
  • Tags

    9/11 afghanistan al qaeda Bailout Bush China Conservatism counterinsurgency democrats Diversity Economics Economy elections fbi foreign policy freedom History Housing Crisis Immigration Inflation Iraq islam Israel Liberalism Liberals Louisiana Media Bias Mexicans Mexico Military Multiculturalism Neoconservatives obama Petraeus Philosophy Politics Racism realism Recession Rhetoric ron paul Steve Sailer strategy tactics Terrorism
  • Archives

  • Feeds and Statistics


    Subscribe To This Feed

  • Locations of visitors to this page

  • Add to Technorati Favorites

  • hitcounter

  • StumbleUpon

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: Mistylook by Sadish.