<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Emerging Bush-Clinton Duopoly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mansizedtarget.wordpress.com/2007/10/09/the-emerging-bush-clinton-duopoly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mansizedtarget.wordpress.com/2007/10/09/the-emerging-bush-clinton-duopoly/</link>
	<description>Paleoconservative Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:32:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://mansizedtarget.wordpress.com/2007/10/09/the-emerging-bush-clinton-duopoly/#comment-4283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansizedtarget.wordpress.com/2007/10/09/the-emerging-bush-clinton-duopoly/#comment-4283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s some good commentary on this same issue in this week&#039;s Economist as well, which I was reading on the way to work this morning. The prospect of 28 years of Bush/Clinton is indeed pretty scary. My favorite quote from our dear Sir:

&quot;One of the virtues of the American political system is that it is supposed to produce shake-ups whenever a new president takes over. Mrs Clinton will bring back the same cast of characters that everybody wearied of in the 1990s, from slick money-raisers like Terry McAuliffe to professional conservative-haters like Sidney Blumenthal.

Back in 1993 Jacob Weisberg, writing in the New Republic, accused the Clinton team of “Clincest”—being a “tight, hermetic and incestuous clique” who went to the same universities and hung out at the same Democratic gabfests. Mrs Clinton&#039;s election will not only perpetuate “Clincest” for another four or eight years; it will also add another dollop of ageing baby-boomer self-satisfaction. During a campaign speech earlier this year Mr Clinton remarked that he once told Hillary, when they were both students at Yale, that “I have met all the most gifted people in our generation and you&#039;re the best.” This sort of attitude will be difficult to live with.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s some good commentary on this same issue in this week&#8217;s Economist as well, which I was reading on the way to work this morning. The prospect of 28 years of Bush/Clinton is indeed pretty scary. My favorite quote from our dear Sir:</p>
<p>&#8220;One of the virtues of the American political system is that it is supposed to produce shake-ups whenever a new president takes over. Mrs Clinton will bring back the same cast of characters that everybody wearied of in the 1990s, from slick money-raisers like Terry McAuliffe to professional conservative-haters like Sidney Blumenthal.</p>
<p>Back in 1993 Jacob Weisberg, writing in the New Republic, accused the Clinton team of “Clincest”—being a “tight, hermetic and incestuous clique” who went to the same universities and hung out at the same Democratic gabfests. Mrs Clinton&#8217;s election will not only perpetuate “Clincest” for another four or eight years; it will also add another dollop of ageing baby-boomer self-satisfaction. During a campaign speech earlier this year Mr Clinton remarked that he once told Hillary, when they were both students at Yale, that “I have met all the most gifted people in our generation and you&#8217;re the best.” This sort of attitude will be difficult to live with.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

