<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama the Chameleon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mansizedtarget.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/obama-the-chameleon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mansizedtarget.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/obama-the-chameleon/</link>
	<description>Paleoconservative Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:44:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Manley</title>
		<link>http://mansizedtarget.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/obama-the-chameleon/#comment-8112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Manley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 11:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansizedtarget.com/?p=1959#comment-8112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Obama&#039;s a chameleon, it&#039;s only partly out of political expediency.  He seems to honestly believe that there is no problem in the world that can&#039;t be solved by the combined force of his charisma, intelligence, and personal story.  As a consequence, he views every issue in the context of its personal relationship to him.

This speech to the Muslim world was a good example.  On the same trip he provided another good example when he declared his visit to Buchenwald &quot;personal&quot; because of the stories his great uncle told him about liberating a concentration camp.  I can&#039;t think of a more inappropriate place in which to inject yourself into the storyline with some sort of special moral claim.  But for Obama, he simply can&#039;t help it.  Rather than solemnly mark the visit with humility and a sober appreciation for man&#039;s capacity for evil, the occasion still must somehow tie back into his personal story, as if all history has led up to his ascendancy. 

I find the comparisons to Lincoln particularly demonstrative, not because of any major similarity between the men, but because it illustrates his narcissism so clearly.  Take a Lincoln speech and count the personal references.  Then take an Obama speech and count the personal references.  

To a certain extent it&#039;s hard to blame Obama.  He is an extremely intelligent man, a great speaker, and it appears to be a good judge of character.  If you look at his career path, he&#039;s seen only success, and he&#039;s become the most powerful person in the world with hardly a hitch.  He&#039;s quickly amassed vast new powers for himself as President, and there are millions that share and feed the belief that he is a unique historical figure with the power to radically change the world for better.

And he probably is a unique historical figure who will radically change his country, and through it, the world.  The only problem is that because of the combination of his intelligence, elite education, and his race, he&#039;s also faced few significant challenges in his rise.  So he is a man who doesn&#039;t realize he can fall, and who also sees himself as the solution to all the world&#039;s problems.  And that is why I think his presidency is potentially the most disastrous development in American history.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Obama&#8217;s a chameleon, it&#8217;s only partly out of political expediency.  He seems to honestly believe that there is no problem in the world that can&#8217;t be solved by the combined force of his charisma, intelligence, and personal story.  As a consequence, he views every issue in the context of its personal relationship to him.</p>
<p>This speech to the Muslim world was a good example.  On the same trip he provided another good example when he declared his visit to Buchenwald &#8220;personal&#8221; because of the stories his great uncle told him about liberating a concentration camp.  I can&#8217;t think of a more inappropriate place in which to inject yourself into the storyline with some sort of special moral claim.  But for Obama, he simply can&#8217;t help it.  Rather than solemnly mark the visit with humility and a sober appreciation for man&#8217;s capacity for evil, the occasion still must somehow tie back into his personal story, as if all history has led up to his ascendancy. </p>
<p>I find the comparisons to Lincoln particularly demonstrative, not because of any major similarity between the men, but because it illustrates his narcissism so clearly.  Take a Lincoln speech and count the personal references.  Then take an Obama speech and count the personal references.  </p>
<p>To a certain extent it&#8217;s hard to blame Obama.  He is an extremely intelligent man, a great speaker, and it appears to be a good judge of character.  If you look at his career path, he&#8217;s seen only success, and he&#8217;s become the most powerful person in the world with hardly a hitch.  He&#8217;s quickly amassed vast new powers for himself as President, and there are millions that share and feed the belief that he is a unique historical figure with the power to radically change the world for better.</p>
<p>And he probably is a unique historical figure who will radically change his country, and through it, the world.  The only problem is that because of the combination of his intelligence, elite education, and his race, he&#8217;s also faced few significant challenges in his rise.  So he is a man who doesn&#8217;t realize he can fall, and who also sees himself as the solution to all the world&#8217;s problems.  And that is why I think his presidency is potentially the most disastrous development in American history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneSTDV</title>
		<link>http://mansizedtarget.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/obama-the-chameleon/#comment-8111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OneSTDV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansizedtarget.com/?p=1959#comment-8111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The curious thing:  Liberals don&#039;t seem to care about his associations with Muslims.  They don&#039;t see Islam as the threat many conservatives do.  This is all consistent with their cultural relativism.  These individuals do not consider American ideals of freedom and liberty superior or more conducive to a proper society than the mores of Arab Muslim countries.  In fact, Obama agrees, decrying anyone who would dare criticize Arab Muslim subjugation of women.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The curious thing:  Liberals don&#8217;t seem to care about his associations with Muslims.  They don&#8217;t see Islam as the threat many conservatives do.  This is all consistent with their cultural relativism.  These individuals do not consider American ideals of freedom and liberty superior or more conducive to a proper society than the mores of Arab Muslim countries.  In fact, Obama agrees, decrying anyone who would dare criticize Arab Muslim subjugation of women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
