I have no problem if people want to call the ex-KKK psycho shooting in Kansas an act of terrorism. It is exactly that. It’s designed to intimidate people going about their normal affairs, congregating with their coreligionists and other members of the community, and otherwise doing no harm to anyone. I expect the White House to issue a solemn condemnation, which is more than appropriate. But I have to wonder, why did the same White House go so far out of its way to deny that the act of Nidal Hasan was not the mere act of a lunatic, but rather a religiously and ideologically driven act of terrorism at Fort Hood, in stark contrast to the more recent one, which appears a mere act of insanity by someone who was arguably insane?!?