The BP disaster will fade from the news, now that the well has been capped. Thankfully, it’s impact appears far less than originally feared. Time Magazine, to its credit, ran a piece noting that a variety of environmental factors–the temperature of the water, the type of oil involved, the significant presence of oil eating bacteria, the currents created by the Mississippi River–have all conspired to prevent significant mass death of birds, marine mammals, and fish. The spill resonated so long as the awesome flow of oil and methane continued from the broken wellhead, but what was missing were the pathetic images that came out of the Valdes spill: hundreds of dead fish, animals, and birds covered in black sludge. The apparent problem and its downstream impact diverged wildly.
This spill clearly was a very big problem, and BP should pay for what it has done to the region and its various stakeholders. But, at the same time, rational adults should weight the pros and cons of drilling, particularly if the factors at work here would mitigate any future spills, and particularly if “lessons learned” can make such spills less likely in the future. A society governed by adults does not act on the basis of emotional over-reaction. This is the point of legislative deliberation and public policy: to elevate our decisions and balance all of the competing interests, an important one of which is the steady supply of oil to our energy-dependent, modern society.
Subscribe To This Feed
